Mason, Heather
Person Preferred Name
Heather Mason
Affiliation
Related Works
Content type
Digital Document
Abstract
Autistic burnout, characterised by chronic exhaustion, reduced tolerance to stimuli, and loss of executive function skills (Raymaker, et al., 2020) has severe consequences, including heightened mental and physical health problems, reduced capacity for independent living, decreased quality of life, and suicide attempts (Arnold et al., 2023a; Higgins et al., 2021; Mantzalas, Richdale, Adikari, et al., 2022b; Raymaker et al., 2020). Although autistic burnout has been validated as a syndrome that is distinct from depression and occupational burnout (Higgins et al., 2021; Raymaker et al., 2020), it is unclear if mental health treatment providers are able to distinguish depression from autistic burnout (Rose, 2018). Yet, some treatments such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Behaviour Activation (BA) may be ineffective or contra-indicated (Higgins et al., 2021). Considering the limited literature on autistic burnout, the complexity of treating it, and the possible harm involved in providing a treatment that may be contraindicated, it is critical to gain a deeper understanding of this syndrome. This study aimed to explore Autistic experiences accessing treatment for autistic burnout and their perspectives on the effectiveness of the treatments that were offered to them. Eleven participants completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was informed by an interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) framework using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach at a semantic level. Participants reported that clinicians often failed to identify autistic burnout and generally lacked knowledge of the condition. Misdiagnoses were common, leading to treatments that delayed recovery and exacerbated symptoms of autistic burnout. Participants described negative experiences accessing support, including lack of support services, which eroded their faith in the healthcare system. Potential effective treatments and supports were identified, primarily the need for rest and practical support. These findings highlight the need to raise awareness among clinicians about the nature of autistic burnout, the importance of collaborating with the Autistic client to develop a treatment plan, and the general need for more services for Autistic adults. Essay submission was sponsored by Dr. Gabriela Ionita, (Humanities and Social Sciences Department) for course PSYC 4400 and was presented at the New Westminster campus on April 11, 2024, for Student Research Days 2024..
Origin Information
Content type
Digital Document
Abstract
Autistic burnout, characterised by chronic exhaustion, reduced tolerance to stimuli, and loss of executive function skills (Raymaker, et al., 2020) has severe consequences, including heightened mental and physical health problems, reduced capacity for independent living, decreased quality of life, and suicide attempts (Arnold et al., 2023a; Higgins et al., 2021; Mantzalas, Richdale, Adikari, et al., 2022b; Raymaker et al., 2020). Although autistic burnout has been validated as a syndrome that is distinct from depression and occupational burnout (Higgins et al., 2021; Raymaker et al., 2020), it is unclear if mental health treatment providers are able to distinguish depression from autistic burnout (Rose, 2018). Yet, some treatments such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Behaviour Activation (BA) may be ineffective or contra-indicated (Higgins et al., 2021). Considering the limited literature on autistic burnout, the complexity of treating it, and the possible harm involved in providing a treatment that may be contraindicated, it is critical to gain a deeper understanding of this syndrome. This study aimed to explore Autistic experiences accessing treatment for autistic burnout and their perspectives on the effectiveness of the treatments that were offered to them. Eleven participants completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was informed by an interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) framework using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach at a semantic level. Participants reported that clinicians often failed to identify autistic burnout and generally lacked knowledge of the condition. Misdiagnoses were common, leading to treatments that delayed recovery and exacerbated symptoms of autistic burnout. Participants described negative experiences accessing support, including lack of support services, which eroded their faith in the healthcare system. Potential effective treatments and supports were identified, primarily the need for rest and practical support. These findings highlight the need to raise awareness among clinicians about the nature of autistic burnout, the importance of collaborating with the Autistic client to develop a treatment plan, and the general need for more services for Autistic adults.
Origin Information
Content type
Digital Document
Abstract
Autistic burnout, characterised by chronic exhaustion, reduced tolerance to stimuli, and loss of executive function skills (Raymaker, et al., 2020), can have severe consequences, including heightened mental and physical health problems, reduced capacity for independent living, decreased quality of life, and suicide attempts (Raymaker et al., 2020). Although autistic burnout has been validated as a syndrome that is distinct from depression and occupational burnout (Raymaker, et al., 2020), it is unclear if mental health treatment providers are able to distinguish depression from autistic burnout (Rose, 2018). Yet, some treatments such as CBT and Behaviour Activation may be ineffective or contra-indicated. Considering the limited literature on autistic burnout, the complexity of treating it, and the possible harm involved in providing a treatment that may be contraindicated, it is critical to gain a deeper understanding of this syndrome. This study aimed to explore autistic experiences accessing treatment for autistic burnout and their perspectives on the effectiveness of the treatments that were offered to them. Participants completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was informed by an interpretive phenomenological framework using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach at a semantic level. Initial findings elucidated critical themes that highlight the need to raise awareness among clinicians about the nature of autistic burnout and the importance of working with the autistic person to develop a treatment plan.
Origin Information